Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753855Ab3JBNLK (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Oct 2013 09:11:10 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]:33989 "EHLO mail-ie0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753503Ab3JBNLH (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Oct 2013 09:11:07 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20131002115935.GD10099@krava.brq.redhat.com> References: <20131002111958.GC10099@krava.brq.redhat.com> <20131002115935.GD10099@krava.brq.redhat.com> From: Ramkumar Ramachandra Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:40:26 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [BUG] perf timechart segfault To: Jiri Olsa Cc: LKML , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 736 Lines: 17 Jiri Olsa wrote: > looks like you're missing this one: > (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux perf/core) Very messy; doesn't rebase on top of the latest torvalds/linux.git cleanly: I get a merge conflict at patch 9 of 74. Since my work is based on torvalds/linux.git, I was hoping to rebase it on top of Arnaldo's tree, but that results in conflicts too: I'm resolving them now. Are the merge windows always this large? Why isn't Arnaldo's tree listed in MAINTAINERS? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/