Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754174Ab3JBN0h (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Oct 2013 09:26:37 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:35300 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753559Ab3JBN0f (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Oct 2013 09:26:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:26:31 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Ramkumar Ramachandra Cc: Jiri Olsa , LKML , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [BUG] perf timechart segfault Message-ID: <20131002132631.GC27811@gmail.com> References: <20131002111958.GC10099@krava.brq.redhat.com> <20131002115935.GD10099@krava.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 959 Lines: 26 * Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > Jiri Olsa wrote: > > looks like you're missing this one: > > (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux perf/core) > > Very messy; doesn't rebase on top of the latest torvalds/linux.git > cleanly: I get a merge conflict at patch 9 of 74. Since my work is based > on torvalds/linux.git, I was hoping to rebase it on top of Arnaldo's > tree, but that results in conflicts too: I'm resolving them now. > > Are the merge windows always this large? Why isn't Arnaldo's tree listed > in MAINTAINERS? note that it's Arnaldo's development tree, not a tree to generally base pull requests on - that is what tip:perf/core is for. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/