Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:17:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:17:29 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:46012 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:17:27 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:23:26 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@duckman.distro.conectiva To: Roman Zippel Cc: "Murray J. Root" , Subject: Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1224 Lines: 35 On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Roman Zippel wrote: > We have to find ways now to keep information free and still allow the > people, who produce information (software, music or movies) to make a > living. Either that or we have to pay with our freedom. That tool is called copyright. The author releases the work and in exchange for that a TEMPORARY government protected monopoly on commercial replication of that work is granted. The main problem nowadays seems to be that: 1) the "temporary" has been extended by politicians into an effectively infinite time 2) the copyright holder has much more rights than those granted by copyright legislation (due to eg. DMCA and a on of other bought laws) 3) the work could be binary, it would be nice if the source code would also have to be released into the public domain after the copyright has expired Rik -- A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/