Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:52:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:52:22 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:43962 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:52:20 -0400 Subject: Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5) From: Alan Cox To: Davide Libenzi Cc: Mark Mielke , "Charles 'Buck' Krasic" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-aio In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 22 Oct 2002 19:13:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1035310415.31873.120.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 754 Lines: 15 On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 18:47, Davide Libenzi wrote: > Since the sys_epoll ( and /dev/epoll ) fd support standard polling, you > can mix sys_epoll handling with other methods like poll() and the AIO's > POLL function when it'll be ready. For example, for devices that sys_epoll > intentionally does not support, you can use a method like : The more important question is why do you need epoll. asynchronous I/O completions setting a list of futexes can already be made to do the job and is much more flexible. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/