Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755156Ab3JCR25 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:28:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:3783 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755123Ab3JCR2z (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:28:55 -0400 From: Petr Holasek To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , Petr Holasek , Petr Benas Subject: [PATCH] perf: Fix failing assertions in perf bench numa Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:28:45 +0200 Message-Id: <1380821325-4017-1-git-send-email-pholasek@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4170 Lines: 146 Patch adds more subtle handling of -C and -N parameters in parse_{cpu,node}_setup_list() functions when there isn't enough NUMA nodes or CPUs present. Instead of assertion and terminating benchmark, partial test is skipped with error message and perf will continue to the next one. Fixed problem can be easily reproduced on machine with only one NUMA node: # Running numa/mem benchmark... # Running main, "perf bench numa mem -a" ... # Running RAM-bw-remote, "perf bench numa mem -p 1 -t 1 -P 1024 -C 0 -M 1 -s perf: bench/numa.c:622: parse_setup_node_list: Assertion `!(bind_node_0 < 0 || bind_node_0 >= g->p.nr_nodes)' failed. Aborted Signed-off-by: Petr Benas Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek --- tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c index 30d1c32..64fa01c 100644 --- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c +++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c @@ -429,14 +429,14 @@ static int parse_cpu_list(const char *arg) return 0; } -static void parse_setup_cpu_list(void) +static int parse_setup_cpu_list(void) { struct thread_data *td; char *str0, *str; int t; if (!g->p.cpu_list_str) - return; + return 0; dprintf("g->p.nr_tasks: %d\n", g->p.nr_tasks); @@ -500,8 +500,12 @@ static void parse_setup_cpu_list(void) dprintf("CPUs: %d_%d-%d#%dx%d\n", bind_cpu_0, bind_len, bind_cpu_1, step, mul); - BUG_ON(bind_cpu_0 < 0 || bind_cpu_0 >= g->p.nr_cpus); - BUG_ON(bind_cpu_1 < 0 || bind_cpu_1 >= g->p.nr_cpus); + if (bind_cpu_0 >= g->p.nr_cpus || bind_cpu_1 >= g->p.nr_cpus) { + printf("\nTest not applicable, system has only %d CPUs.\n", g->p.nr_cpus); + return -1; + } + + BUG_ON(bind_cpu_0 < 0 || bind_cpu_1 < 0); BUG_ON(bind_cpu_0 > bind_cpu_1); for (bind_cpu = bind_cpu_0; bind_cpu <= bind_cpu_1; bind_cpu += step) { @@ -541,6 +545,7 @@ out: printf("# NOTE: %d tasks bound, %d tasks unbound\n", t, g->p.nr_tasks - t); free(str0); + return 0; } static int parse_cpus_opt(const struct option *opt __maybe_unused, @@ -561,14 +566,14 @@ static int parse_node_list(const char *arg) return 0; } -static void parse_setup_node_list(void) +static int parse_setup_node_list(void) { struct thread_data *td; char *str0, *str; int t; if (!g->p.node_list_str) - return; + return 0; dprintf("g->p.nr_tasks: %d\n", g->p.nr_tasks); @@ -619,8 +624,12 @@ static void parse_setup_node_list(void) dprintf("NODEs: %d-%d #%d\n", bind_node_0, bind_node_1, step); - BUG_ON(bind_node_0 < 0 || bind_node_0 >= g->p.nr_nodes); - BUG_ON(bind_node_1 < 0 || bind_node_1 >= g->p.nr_nodes); + if (bind_node_0 >= g->p.nr_nodes || bind_node_1 >= g->p.nr_nodes) { + printf("\nTest not applicable, system has only %d nodes.\n", g->p.nr_nodes); + return -1; + } + + BUG_ON(bind_node_0 < 0 || bind_node_1 < 0); BUG_ON(bind_node_0 > bind_node_1); for (bind_node = bind_node_0; bind_node <= bind_node_1; bind_node += step) { @@ -651,6 +660,7 @@ out: printf("# NOTE: %d tasks mem-bound, %d tasks unbound\n", t, g->p.nr_tasks - t); free(str0); + return 0; } static int parse_nodes_opt(const struct option *opt __maybe_unused, @@ -1356,8 +1366,8 @@ static int init(void) init_thread_data(); tprintf("#\n"); - parse_setup_cpu_list(); - parse_setup_node_list(); + if (parse_setup_cpu_list() || parse_setup_node_list()) + return -1; tprintf("#\n"); print_summary(); @@ -1600,7 +1610,6 @@ static int run_bench_numa(const char *name, const char **argv) return 0; err: - usage_with_options(numa_usage, options); return -1; } @@ -1701,8 +1710,7 @@ static int bench_all(void) BUG_ON(ret < 0); for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) { - if (run_bench_numa(tests[i][0], tests[i] + 1)) - return -1; + run_bench_numa(tests[i][0], tests[i] + 1); } printf("\n"); -- 1.8.3.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/