Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:04:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:04:26 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.131]:3771 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:04:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:03:55 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Benjamin LaHaise , Andrew Morton cc: Rik van Riel , "Eric W. Biederman" , Bill Davidsen , Dave McCracken , Linux Kernel , Linux Memory Management Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.43-mm2] New shared page table patch Message-ID: <408130000.1035313435@flay> In-Reply-To: <20021022140155.E20957@redhat.com> References: <2629464880.1035240956@[10.10.2.3]> <20021022131930.A20957@redhat.com> <396790000.1035308200@flay> <20021022134501.C20957@redhat.com> <3DB59134.38AA41F6@digeo.com> <20021022140155.E20957@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 697 Lines: 18 >> Have you reviewed the hugetlbfs and hugetlbpage-backed-shm patches? >> >> That code is still requiring CAP_IPC_LOCK, although I suspect it >> would be better to allow hugetlbfs mmap to be purely administered >> by file permissions. > > Can we delete the specialty syscalls now? I was lead to believe that Linus designed them, so he may be emotionally attatched to them, but I think there would be few others that would cry over the loss ... M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/