Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:20:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:20:19 -0400 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([208.129.208.51]:37531 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:20:14 -0400 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:35:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com To: "Charles 'Buck' Krasic" cc: Mark Mielke , linux-kernel , linux-aio Subject: Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1145 Lines: 37 On 22 Oct 2002, Charles 'Buck' Krasic wrote: > So maybe epoll's moment of utility is only transient. It should have > been in the kernel a long time ago. Is it too late now that AIO is > imminent? This is not my call actually. But beside comparing actual performance between AIO and sys_epoll, one of the advantages that the patch had is this : arch/i386/kernel/entry.S | 4 drivers/char/Makefile | 4 fs/Makefile | 4 fs/file_table.c | 4 fs/pipe.c | 36 + include/asm-i386/poll.h | 1 include/asm-i386/unistd.h | 3 include/linux/fs.h | 4 include/linux/list.h | 5 include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h | 4 include/linux/sys.h | 2 include/net/sock.h | 10 net/ipv4/tcp.c | 4 That is, it has a very little "intrusion" in the original code by plugging in the existing architecture. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/