Message-ID: <3A7B1129.2ED4CCE4@dmi.usherb.ca>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 14:57:29 -0500
From: Delta <birtl00@dmi.usherb.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: System unresponsitive when copying HD/HD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi,

I backup my linux partition once a month from my second IDE drive to an
empty partition
on the first IDE disk. I have about 2.8 Gig to copy, and I use <cp -ax /
/mnt/hd> to do the copy.

While cp is copying from the second hard disk to the first hard disk,
I find my system performance
drop VERY sharply.  X is sloppy, even bash takes many seconds to
respond.  I using two
recent IDE disk (Fudjisu 13 gig, Maxtor 20 Gig), so I'm wondering why
the system is so slow?  My mobo is a FIC SD11 and I have an athlon
550 Mhz.

I tried renicing the process priority to 20, but I don't see any
improvement on system usability.
Hard disk activity is still frenzy, even if there are other task
runnable (X, g++ jobs).
Note that I'm running as root when I'm doing the copy.

So I'd like to know why the linux kernel can't schedule the task less
often?
I guess that copying file doesn't eat too many CPU cycles, but is
running almost all the time
in kernel mode doing I/O... Is there a way to prevent a process from
"hogging" the hard disk like that?
It's pretty annoying when the system is sluggish like that.

Thanks a lot,
Laurent Birtz <birtl00@dmi.usherb.ca>

If you wish to reply, I'm not on the list so reply directly to me..
?:.?˛???m???ka??b???zwm??b????˛???m?b??????z_???^n?r???z???h?????&???z??z?ޗ?+??^jǫy?m??@A?a?????0??n??+??d