Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:38:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:38:31 -0400 Received: from 62-190-218-62.pdu.pipex.net ([62.190.218.62]:51727 "EHLO darkstar.example.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:38:30 -0400 From: jbradford@dial.pipex.com Message-Id: <200210221953.g9MJrvP6002833@darkstar.example.net> Subject: [FLAMEWAR] Bitkeeper waffle To: mark@mark.mielke.cc (Mark Mielke) Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 20:53:57 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20021022192442.GA1814@mark.mielke.cc> from "Mark Mielke" at Oct 22, 2002 03:24:42 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1087 Lines: 24 > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 01:46:04PM +0100, jbradford@dial.pipex.com wrote: > > It was initially developed as a C front end to VUCK, but was later > > re-written, using none of the VUCK code, but initially keeping parts > > of the C front end. The GNU project was originally developed without > > using any proprietary software. > > > So, non-GPL software was used, but the software that was used was, at > > least to begin with, all non-proprietary. > > Even if this was true (I have no reason to doubt it)... > > Is the idea that "Free Software Providers" must use "Free Software" to > produce a reasonable decree from the king of "Free Software"? It's up to everybody to decide what suits them. I was only answering a question about the GNU project, I wasn't trying to tell anybody what software they should and shouldn't use. John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/