Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:57:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:57:13 -0400 Received: from almesberger.net ([63.105.73.239]:42246 "EHLO host.almesberger.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:57:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:02:48 -0300 From: Werner Almesberger To: Richard J Moore Cc: Rob Landley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4 Ready list - Kernel Hooks Message-ID: <20021022180248.A2599@almesberger.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com on Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 01:24:49PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 824 Lines: 22 Richard J Moore wrote: > Kernel Hooks is also ready, I'm a bit puzzled as to what those hooks accomplish. They look like a less flexible but a little faster and more portable variant of kprobes. Is this what they are ? If yes, does it really make sense to have two so similar mechanisms for tapping into execution flows in the kernel ? - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/