Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S264900AbSJVVfk>; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:35:40 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S264864AbSJVVfk>; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:35:40 -0400
Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:25275 "EHLO
	irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S264900AbSJVVfk>; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:35:40 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use 1ULL instead of 1UL in kernel/signal.c
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, mingo@redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <20021022222719.H27461@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
References: <20021022222719.H27461@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) 
Date: 22 Oct 2002 22:57:59 +0100
Message-Id: <1035323879.329.185.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 541
Lines: 13

On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 22:27, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> 
> On PA-RISC we have 36 signals defined for hpux compatibility.  So M()
> and T() in kernel/signal.c try to do (1UL << 33) which is garbage on 32-bit
> architectures.  How do people feel about this patch?

How does the compiler output look ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/