Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:42:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:42:45 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:57361 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:42:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 22:48:53 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Alan Cox Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Linux Kernel Mailing List , mingo@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] use 1ULL instead of 1UL in kernel/signal.c Message-ID: <20021022224853.I27461@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20021022222719.H27461@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <1035323879.329.185.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1035323879.329.185.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:57:59PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 847 Lines: 21 On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:57:59PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 22:27, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > On PA-RISC we have 36 signals defined for hpux compatibility. So M() > > and T() in kernel/signal.c try to do (1UL << 33) which is garbage on 32-bit > > architectures. How do people feel about this patch? > > How does the compiler output look ? uhh.. 200 bytes extra on x86 ;-( -rw-r--r-- 1 willy users 17956 Oct 22 14:44 kernel/signal.o -rw-r--r-- 1 willy users 17748 Oct 22 06:50 kernel/signal.o_orig -- Revolutions do not require corporate support. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/