Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:52:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:52:02 -0400 Received: from fmr02.intel.com ([192.55.52.25]:6870 "EHLO caduceus.fm.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:52:01 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" To: "'Alan Cox'" , Corey Minyard Cc: Adrian Bunk , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Cahill, Ben M" , "Rhoads, Rob" , "Sousou, Imad" Subject: RE: [PATCH] IPMI driver for Linux, version 7 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:58:05 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1882 Lines: 43 > On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 22:05, Corey Minyard wrote: > > >Am I right that this makes it impossible to include an > > > IPMI driver into the kernel (this isn't GPL-compatible)? > > > > > I do not read it so, but perhaps you are right. I will > > ask. I'm sure I > > will receive a resounding "maybe" as the answer. I was > > working with > > people at Intel on this, and they had another driver they > > wanted to use > > for IPMI, and wanted to push it into the kernel, but it had some > > problems so I wrote this as a replacement. So I don't > > think Intel sees > > it this way (at least those at Intel I was working with). > > Intel tend to see everything Intel's way. Perhaps someone from Intel > could clarify this situation - on list ? > > I'd hate us to have to have an IPMI driver that US citizens > couldnt use Corey's IPMI driver is GPL, as are all the other components of the kernel. People who are worried about patents on IPMI implementations can get a royalty-free license any time by going to http://www.intel.com/design/servers/ipmi/spec.htm and signing the Adopter's agreement. Yes, to get the royalty-free patent license for implementations of the IPMI spec, you have to give a promise not to sue other Adopters of IPMI, but I don't see why anyone who isn't planning on going around suing people should have a problem signing this agreement. In any case this is very similar to USB, which also has an Adopter's agreement for patents, and USB has been in the kernel for years without causing any IP problems. Inaky Perez-Gonzalez -- Not speaking for Intel - opinions are my own [or my fault] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/