Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:22:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:22:10 -0400 Received: from Campbell.cwx.net ([216.17.176.12]:40454 "EHLO campbell.cwx.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:22:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:28:13 -0600 From: Allen Campbell To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Allen Campbell , lkml Subject: Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new Message-ID: <20021022162813.A23008@const.> References: <20021022141336.A21184@const.> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from nico@cam.org on Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:32:54PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 973 Lines: 24 On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:32:54PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > So what's your own particular problem with BK again if you don't have to use > it? I didn't mention that I had a problem with it. I do have some questions. If I one day had the idea of building a filesystem where version control is inherent, could this be done with BK? Further, I understand the design of EXT3 uses a form of multiversion concurrency to ensure metadata integrity. Does this constitute "substantially similar capabilities?" That's pretty damn vague. > I hope you still have the hability to write and contribute GPL'ed code. -- Allen Campbell | Lurking at the bottom of the allenc@verinet.com | gravity well, getting old. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/