Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752088Ab3JFIKv (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Oct 2013 04:10:51 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:39353 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751467Ab3JFIKk (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Oct 2013 04:10:40 -0400 Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 10:10:33 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Joe Perches , Josh Triplett , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Check for the FSF mailing address Message-ID: <20131006081033.GA18109@pd.tnic> References: <20131005184307.GA6429@leaf> <1380999108.2081.138.camel@joe-AO722> <20131006062739.GA5218@kroah.com> <1381042912.2081.146.camel@joe-AO722> <20131006070557.GA1679@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131006070557.GA1679@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 801 Lines: 20 On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 12:05:57AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > As an individual file is not the sum of the "program", I would argue > that it is not needed, but some companies like to feel better by > adding it. So I really don't mind either way, as it would involve > arguing with lawyers about this type of thing, and I do enough of that > already that I don't go out of my way to do it more... What about a short sentence pointing at 'COPYING' instead? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/