Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754831Ab3JFVsx (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Oct 2013 17:48:53 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0230.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.230]:60200 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754522Ab3JFVsv (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Oct 2013 17:48:51 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:973:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3353:3622:3653:3698:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3873:3874:4250:4321:5007:6119:6120:7652:7808:7901:10004:10226:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13071:13311:13357,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: glass49_12d998730ad2e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2405 Message-ID: <1381096127.2081.166.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Check for the FSF mailing address From: Joe Perches To: Josh Triplett Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 14:48:47 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20131006213309.GO19510@leaf> References: <20131005184307.GA6429@leaf> <1380999108.2081.138.camel@joe-AO722> <20131006062739.GA5218@kroah.com> <20131006211855.GB19510@leaf> <1381094837.2081.160.camel@joe-AO722> <20131006213309.GO19510@leaf> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1623 Lines: 42 On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 14:33 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 02:27:17PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 14:18 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 11:27:39PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 11:51:48AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 11:43 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > > > Kernel maintainers reject new instances of the GPL boilerplate paragraph > > > > > > directing people to write to the FSF for a copy of the GPL, since the > > > > > > FSF has moved in the past and may do so again. > > [] > > > any objections to merging the patch in its current form? > > > > Your own suggestion that this be applied only to > > patches hasn't been implemented. > > Given Greg's comment that we want to eliminate the existing instances, I > wanted to make sure implementing that change still makes sense. > > I can easily enough make checkpatch emit an ERROR for patches and a WARN > or CHK for existing files, if that's the consensus. Hi Josh Most of the time, action is at least as useful as consensus. If you do the runtime --file check, please use this form: my $msg_type = \&WARN; $msg_type = \&CHK if ($file); &{$msg_type}("FSF_MESSAGE", etc...) (that form matches the trigraph test) Use whatever ERROR/WARN/CHK you think appropriate. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/