Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755095Ab3JGAuW (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Oct 2013 20:50:22 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com ([209.85.217.172]:60596 "EHLO mail-lb0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755021Ab3JGAuU (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Oct 2013 20:50:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20131007003247.GA21999@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20131006203353.GA19795@srcf.ucam.org> <20131006204518.GA20077@srcf.ucam.org> <20131006205928.GA20296@srcf.ucam.org> <20131006233106.GA21562@srcf.ucam.org> <20131006235702.GA21738@srcf.ucam.org> <20131007003247.GA21999@srcf.ucam.org> Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 19:50:18 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: update win8 OSI blacklist From: Felipe Contreras To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1829 Lines: 46 On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 07:27:48PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> If _you_ want to add comments for each entry in the list you can do so >> after this patch is applied. > > If you want to participate in a collaborative development effort you > should pay attention to other people's concerns. I did that when I listened to your comment, and I argued against it. Disagreeing is not the same as not paying attention. > I don't get the final > say in whether or not this patch gets merged, but there's a decent > chance that I'm going to be the one who has to remove the entries again > once the backlight mess is fixed up. My life would be significantly > easier if the entries are unambiguously identified in such a way that I > can remove them without having to dig through git history to figure out > where each came from. And a *single* comment on top of this group entries achieves that just fine. You haven't provided a single argument as to why that wouldn't be the case. In fact, you are the one that is not paying attention. > Is that really an unreasonable request? That wasn't a request, that was an explanation of what would make your life easier. And if uncommented entries is a problem for you, you already have that problem, because the entries to remove are already there, uncommented. The original patch I sent had a comment, so that's not my fault. This patch would not make your life any harder, so that is a red herring. The problem is already there. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/