Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 19:49:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 19:49:18 -0400 Received: from 12-231-249-244.client.attbi.com ([12.231.249.244]:22028 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 19:49:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:54:09 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Richard J Moore Cc: Werner Almesberger , Rob Landley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, S Vamsikrishna Subject: Re: 2.4 Ready list - Kernel Hooks Message-ID: <20021022235409.GC9498@kroah.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 834 Lines: 19 On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:09:38AM +0100, Richard J Moore wrote: > We created > kernel hooks for exactly the same reasons that LSM needs hooks - to allow > ancillary function to exist outside the kernel, to avoid kernel bloat, to > allow more than one function to be called from a given call-back (think of > kdb and kprobes - both need to be called from do_debug). No, that is NOT the same reason LSM needs hooks! LSM hooks are there to mediate access to various kernel objects, from within the kernel itself. Please do not confuse LSM with any of the above projects. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/