Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 03:49:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 03:49:01 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:47118 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 03:49:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:55:02 +0100 From: Russell King To: peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au Cc: david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Ejecting an orinoco card causes hang Message-ID: <20021023085501.A22736@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <15797.63740.520358.783516@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <15797.63740.520358.783516@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au>; from peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au on Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:18:52AM +1000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1650 Lines: 35 On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:18:52AM +1000, peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au wrote: > 4. Transferring lots of data causes the link to collapse, and the > logs to fill up with `eth0: Error -110 writing Tx descriptor to > BAP' messages I see type of behaviour this with an Orinoco Silver card while trying to set the mode/essid. I took the wvlan_cs code from my RH7.2 box and dropped it into 2.5 - seems to work (although how reliable it is I don't know yet; I need to get something for this card to talk to.) http://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/rmk/wireless/wvlan_cs-2.5.44.diff Another difference that I noticed was that when no AP is in range, and the ESSID has never been set, orinoco v0.07 reports "unspecified SSID!!!" as the ESSID, as does wvlan_cs on the same RH7.2 kernel and with wvlan_cs on 2.5.44. However, orinoco 0.13a reports an empty string. Looking at the bytes read off the card, it seems that it returns a zero length word, followed by the string "unspecified SSID!!!" with orinoco 0.13a. Also, (iirc) I could make the card happier with the orinoco 0.13a driver if I made it read excess bytes when reading the BAP (like wvlan_cs does.) However, this didn't competely solve the problem - I still saw what I think are firmware crashes. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/