Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755560Ab3JIToz (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:44:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37643 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754048Ab3JITox (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:44:53 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 21:46:58 +0200 From: Alexander Gordeev To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Cc: linux-scsi , LKML , target-devel , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: scsi-mq updated to latest linux-block/new-queue Message-ID: <20131009194658.GA3066@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> References: <1381345971.19256.461.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1381345971.19256.461.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 962 Lines: 25 On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:12:51PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > Just a heads up that the scsi-mq alpha branch has been updated to Jen's > latest linux-block/new-queue containing hch's recent blk-mq > improvements, along with Alexander's patch for the is_flush_fua + > queue_depth=1 bug. Oh, I have not expected it could be picked up. In fact I agree it needs to be updated with what you spotted: "Also, these extra increments should probably happen only when the passed queue_depth == 1 && reserved_tags == 0." What is the criteria for patches to include in your tree? I would suggest to consider this one https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/9/90 if it fits. -- Regards, Alexander Gordeev agordeev@redhat.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/