Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755754Ab3JIUdj (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:33:39 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:11023 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754759Ab3JIUdi (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:33:38 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,1066,1371106800"; d="scan'208";a="390725881" Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:33:38 -0700 From: Sarah Sharp To: Xiao Jin Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, william.douglas@intel.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org, jslaby@suse.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH] xhci: correct the usage of USB_CTRL_SET_TIMEOUT Message-ID: <20131009203338.GB8222@xanatos> References: <1381281919.9531.12.camel@xiaojin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1381281919.9531.12.camel@xiaojin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3069 Lines: 79 Hi Xiao, On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 09:25:19AM +0800, Xiao Jin wrote: > From: xiao jin > Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 09:09:46 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] xhci: correct the usage of USB_CTRL_SET_TIMEOUT As I mentioned in another email, you need to use `git send-email` to avoid putting these extra lines in your patches. They won't apply otherwise. > The usage of USB_CTRL_SET_TIMEOUT is incorrect. The > definition of USB_CTRL_SET_TIMEOUT is 5000ms. The > input timeout to wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout > is jiffies. That makes the timeout be longer than what > we want, such as 50s in some platform. > > The patch is to convert USB_CTRL_SET_TIMEOUT to jiffies as > command completion event timeout. Good catch! I agree this should be fixed. However, can you fix this by changing the code to use XHCI_CMD_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT instead of USB_CTRL_SET_TIMEOUT? That's properly defined as five seconds: xhci.h:#define XHCI_CMD_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT (5 * HZ) Can you fix this and use `git send-email` to send a v2 patch? Also, are there any really bad effects of this bug, other than possibly taking a really long time to suspend a system? I'm also concerned about *why* your host controller is taking so long to respond to the Stop Endpoint command. Was it because of the bug fixed by the other patch you sent? Thanks, Sarah Sharp > Signed-off-by: xiao jin > --- > drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c | 2 +- > drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c > index 1d35459..78cf294 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c > @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static int xhci_stop_device(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, int slot_id, int suspend) > /* Wait for last stop endpoint command to finish */ > timeleft = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout( > cmd->completion, > - USB_CTRL_SET_TIMEOUT); > + msecs_to_jiffies(USB_CTRL_SET_TIMEOUT)); > if (timeleft <= 0) { > xhci_warn(xhci, "%s while waiting for stop endpoint command\n", > timeleft == 0 ? "Timeout" : "Signal"); > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c > index 9478caa..f9ebc72 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c > @@ -3486,7 +3486,7 @@ int xhci_discover_or_reset_device(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct usb_device *udev) > /* Wait for the Reset Device command to finish */ > timeleft = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout( > reset_device_cmd->completion, > - USB_CTRL_SET_TIMEOUT); > + msecs_to_jiffies(USB_CTRL_SET_TIMEOUT)); > if (timeleft <= 0) { > xhci_warn(xhci, "%s while waiting for reset device command\n", > timeleft == 0 ? "Timeout" : "Signal"); > -- > 1.7.1 > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/