Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755452Ab3JJNeq (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:34:46 -0400 Received: from eu1sys200aog103.obsmtp.com ([207.126.144.115]:41207 "EHLO eu1sys200aog103.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752326Ab3JJNen convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:34:43 -0400 From: Maxime COQUELIN To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Srinivas KANDAGATLA , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell , Rob Landley , Russell King , Grant Likely , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , Stephen GALLIMORE , Stuart MENEFY , Lee Jones , Gabriel FERNANDEZ Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:33:43 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add I2C support to ST SoCs Thread-Topic: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add I2C support to ST SoCs Thread-Index: Ac7FvVcWPNmEFKp5RQKOcgLe1Sc+Uw== Message-ID: <5256ACB7.7050302@st.com> References: <1381250576-7916-1-git-send-email-maxime.coquelin@st.com> <525675B6.4080404@st.com> <20131010100354.GE2638@katana> In-Reply-To: <20131010100354.GE2638@katana> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1181 Lines: 29 On 10/10/2013 12:03 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: >>> Changes since v3: >>> - Switch back to vendor specific DT properties regarding the anti-glitch >>> filter configuration, as this IP is the only one having such a filter. >> Do you agree to keep these properties vendor-specifics? > My preference is generic bindings. There are no other users right now, > yet there might be in the future. At least with something similar enough > that the bindings will apply. Was hoping for some additional input, > though, but I am not depending on it. I have to push another revision to change the IRQ flags as reported by Stephen G. I will also revert to generic bindings in this revision. For their documentation, I will add it as soon as you will have created the DT binding documentation of I2C. Is it okay for you? > >> If so, could you take this series for v3.13? > Sure, if it passes the second review... For sure! Regards, Maxime -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/