Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756170Ab3JJRhw (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:37:52 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]:59930 "EHLO mail-ie0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755880Ab3JJRhu (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:37:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1381419752-29733-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> References: <1381419752-29733-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> From: Bjorn Helgaas Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:37:29 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ 3.8.y.z extended stable ] Linux 3.8.13.11 stable review To: Kamal Mostafa Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Luis Henriques Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 914 Lines: 23 On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Kamal Mostafa wrote: > This is the start of the review cycle for the Linux 3.8.13.11 stable kernel. Would anybody be interested in adding some sort of "stable" tag to the subject lines of stable backport patches, e.g., instead of: [PATCH 001/104] htb: fix sign extension bug something like: [STABLE 3.8.13.11 001/104] htb: fix sign extension bug I don't mind having the stable patches on LKML, but it would be nice if it were easier to distinguish stable backports from new patches. I know the patches are nicely threaded behind this message, but some readers don't really pay attention to that. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/