Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:43:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:43:20 -0400 Received: from cse.ogi.edu ([129.95.20.2]:27847 "EHLO church.cse.ogi.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:43:19 -0400 To: Dan Kegel Cc: Davide Libenzi , Mark Mielke , linux-kernel , linux-aio Subject: Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5) References: <3DB6D332.9000709@kegel.com> From: "Charles 'Buck' Krasic" Date: 23 Oct 2002 10:49:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: <3DB6D332.9000709@kegel.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 671 Lines: 26 Dan Kegel writes: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > I may be confused, but I suspect the async poll being proposed by > Ben only delivers absolute readiness, not changes in readiness. > I think epoll is worth having, even if Ben's AIO already handled > networking properly. > - Dan Can someone remind me why poll is needed in the AIO api at all? How would it be used? -- Buck - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/