Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756770Ab3JJTai (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:30:38 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59528 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755772Ab3JJTag (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:30:36 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 21:32:41 +0200 From: Alexander Gordeev To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , linux-scsi , LKML , target-devel , Jens Axboe Subject: Re: scsi-mq updated to latest linux-block/new-queue Message-ID: <20131010193240.GA17206@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> References: <1381345971.19256.461.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> <20131009194658.GA3066@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> <20131010191714.GA3098@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131010191714.GA3098@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 928 Lines: 24 On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:17:14PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > What is the criteria for patches to include in your tree? I would suggest > > to consider this one https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/9/90 if it fits. > > For this one you probably want to send a patch to Jens to move blk-mq-tag.h > to include/linux first instead of doing the relative include hack. I wonder, if blk-mq- prefix should remain?.. This s code seems pretty much generic to me. > Also the blk_mq_*tag* routines you use aren't exported, so a modular build of > the driver with that patch applied will fail. Yep, makes sense. Thanks for pointing out. -- Regards, Alexander Gordeev agordeev@redhat.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/