Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:59:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:59:47 -0400 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([208.129.208.51]:663 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:59:30 -0400 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:14:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com To: "Charles 'Buck' Krasic" cc: linux-kernel , linux-aio Subject: Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 938 Lines: 37 On 23 Oct 2002, Charles 'Buck' Krasic wrote: > > Dan Kegel writes: > > > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > I may be confused, but I suspect the async poll being proposed by > > Ben only delivers absolute readiness, not changes in readiness. > > > I think epoll is worth having, even if Ben's AIO already handled > > networking properly. > > > - Dan > > Can someone remind me why poll is needed in the AIO api at all? > > How would it be used? Maybe my understanding of AIO on Linux is limited but how would you do async accept/connect ? Will you be using std poll/select for that, and then you'll switch to AIO for read/write requests ? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/