Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:30:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:30:29 -0400 Received: from pc132.utati.net ([216.143.22.132]:28033 "HELO merlin.webofficenow.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:30:26 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Rob Landley Reply-To: landley@trommello.org To: nwourms@netscape.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Son of crunch time: the list v1.2. Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:36:33 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <20021021135137.2801edd2.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <3DB4BD8F.1010707@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200210222139.32805.landley@trommello.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1901 Lines: 40 On Tuesday 22 October 2002 12:32, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > As was stated by Dave Jones[1], this is something that will probably should > go in after the freeze. This is just a thought, and it's from somebody who's not going to actually be making any of these decisions, but my idea of "goes in after the freeze" is the same as my idea of "goes in during the stable series". If you'd be happy including something between stable.0 and stable.1, or stable.5 and stable.6, (whether "stable" is called "2.6", "3.0", or "fred") then it makes sense to put it in after the freeze. But if you don't think it would be a good idea to insert it after stable.0, then inserting it after the freeze at all is a bit hypocritical. (Otherwise the freeze isn't too meaningful.) Now, given that, if it could go in during the stable series, why not wait until then and not confuse the issue during stabilization and shutdown of the -pre series? (Or at least hold off until closer to dot-0 release date, and give the existing infrastructure a chance to settle down a bit first. At the very least not rush to get too much in immediately after the freeze.) Admittedly the first dozen releases of 2.4 are a bad example of "stable", but reiserfs did go in circa 2.4.1 and nobody really minded that bit. Maybe LVM and EVMS are similar, self contained, can't possibly hurt anybody who isn't using it type things. (I don't know. The word "maybe" is an important weasel word in that sentence.) Rob -- http://penguicon.sf.net - Terry Pratchett, Eric Raymond, Pete Abrams, Illiad, CmdrTaco, liquid nitrogen ice cream, and caffienated jello. Well why not? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/