Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:20:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:20:26 -0400 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([208.129.208.51]:10397 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:20:26 -0400 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:35:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com To: Benjamin LaHaise cc: linux-kernel , linux-aio Subject: Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5) In-Reply-To: <20021023171818.B9700@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 905 Lines: 24 On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:47:33AM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > Ben, does it work at all currently read/write requests on sockets ? I > > would like to test AIO on networking using my test http server, and I was > > thinking about using poll() for async accept and AIO for read/write. The > > poll() should be pretty fast because there's only one fd in the set and > > the remaining code will use AIO for read/write. Might this work currently ? > > The socket async read/write code is not yet in the kernel. Ok, this pretty much stops every attempt to test/compare AIO with sys_epoll ... ETA ? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/