Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S265252AbSJWVo4>; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:44:56 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S265253AbSJWVo4>; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:44:56 -0400
Received: from smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.141]:784 "EHLO
	smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S265252AbSJWVoz>; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:44:55 -0400
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:51:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
X-X-Sender: roman@serv
To: Brad Chapman <jabiru_croc@yahoo.com>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LinuxKernelConf: does it apply to 2.4 kernels?
In-Reply-To: <20021023211334.12597.qmail@web40009.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210232347480.8911-100000@serv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 678
Lines: 21

Hi,

On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Brad Chapman wrote:

> Does the new LinuxKernelConf configuration system by Roman Zippel apply to
> 2.4-based kernel trees, or only to 2.5-based kernel trees?

Theoretically it's no big problem, it needs a bit of manual work.

> Also, are there any plans to merge it?

No, 2.6 is more important. Should there be huge demand for a backport,
it's not really a problem, but I doubt it will happen.

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/