Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:42:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:41:51 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:3593 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:41:38 -0500 Subject: Re: PROBLEM: 2.2.19pre7 opps on low mem machine To: peter@runestig.com (Peter 'Luna' Runestig) Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 22:42:31 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux Kernel Mailing list) In-Reply-To: <003e01c08d68$fd5b53f0$0201010a@runestig.com> from "Peter 'Luna' Runestig" at Feb 02, 2001 11:39:22 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > OK, following the reiserfs/compiler thread, I can see now that my bug report > may have been ignored since I was using a non-kosher compiler (although I > have used it since late October -99 without any problems). Or, it might not > have been ignored, just nobody told me he/she wasted some time on it. Since > it seems to be hardware related; that oops wasn't the only one, and after > some more strange behaviour, I moved the hard drive to another, almost > identical, PC, with even less memory, 16 MB (but this one I have the chips > to run 48 MB, but I wanted to stress it). And it's been running for a week > now, like a clock. Thanks for the info. I dont ignore gcc 2.95 stuff with 2.2 nowdays since Im pretty sure 2.2 + gcc 2.95 is solid - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/