Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:42:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:42:41 -0500 Received: from cs.columbia.edu ([128.59.16.20]:39897 "EHLO cs.columbia.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:42:35 -0500 Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:42:29 -0800 (PST) From: Ion Badulescu To: Alan Cox cc: Hans Reiser , , , Jan Kasprzak Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink related) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > Oh I can see why Hans wants to cut down his bug reporting load. I can also > say from experience it wont work. If you put #error in then everyone will > mail him and complain it doesnt build, if you put #warning in nobody will > read it and if you dont put anything in you get the odd bug report anyway. > > Basically you can't win and unfortunately a shrink wrap forcing the user > to read the README file for the kernel violates the GPL .. Oh, don't get me wrong, I fully understand that it's a lose-lose situation. All I'm saying is that it was an incredibly bad idea to have two compilers, one broken and one ok, identify themselves as the same version. Ion -- It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/