Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753697Ab3JKXQI (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:16:08 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f170.google.com ([209.85.223.170]:54841 "EHLO mail-ie0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751946Ab3JKXQF (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:16:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Bjorn Helgaas Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:15:40 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bug 60555] New: Some amount of ifconfig cause load average increase and system freeze To: Yaroslav Molochko Cc: Jeff Kirsher , Jesse Brandeburg , Bruce Allan , "e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Thomas Gleixner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1866 Lines: 49 On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > [+cc Thomas, e1000e driver folks, linux-pci, lkml] > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:31 AM, wrote: >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60555 >> >> Bug ID: 60555 >> Summary: Some amount of ifconfig cause load average increase >> and system freeze >> Product: Drivers >> Version: 2.5 >> Kernel Version: 3.10.0 >> Hardware: All >> OS: Linux >> Tree: Mainline >> Status: NEW >> Severity: normal >> Priority: P1 >> Component: PCI >> Assignee: drivers_pci@kernel-bugs.osdl.org >> Reporter: onorua@gmail.com >> Regression: No >> >> I've faced with the situation when system stopped to process any request. >> Further analysis showed that the load average was around 20, and was constantly >> increasing (the normal LA for this system is 0.3-1). > > Thanks for the report; sorry it fell through the cracks. > > Is this problem reproducible? If so, can you try to reproduce it on > v3.11? Can you please attach a complete dmesg log and "lspci -vv" (as > root) output to the bugzilla? > > The BUG_ON you're hitting is here, but I don't know what it means: > > #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS > for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++) > BUG_ON(irq_has_action(entry->irq + i)); > #endif What's the status of this? Is it still a problem? Should we just close the bug as unreproducible? Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/