Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:04:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:04:29 -0400 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:24850 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:04:29 -0400 Message-ID: <3DB764B0.3010204@namesys.com> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 07:10:40 +0400 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2a) Gecko/20020910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Cole CC: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel , Alan Cox Subject: Re: 2.5.44-[mm3, ac2] time to tar zxf kernel tarball compared forvarious fs. References: <1035402133.13140.251.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> <3DB6FF24.9B50A7C0@digeo.com> <1035405140.13083.268.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 666 Lines: 17 Please repeat the test using a tarball created from a reiserfs partition, you'll get better numbers for reiserfs. Not as good as reiser4, but still much better than these. File order from readdir matters a lot. It is a bit amazing how many obscurities can bite you with seemingly simple tests like this. We recently ran into one with tar recognizing that it was writing to /dev/null, and optimizing for it. Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/