Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:55:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:55:23 -0400 Received: from rth.ninka.net ([216.101.162.244]:48279 "EHLO rth.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:55:23 -0400 Subject: Re: feature request - why not make netif_rx() a pointer? From: "David S. Miller" To: Slavcho Nikolov Cc: jt@hpl.hp.com, Linux kernel mailing list , Jeff Garzik In-Reply-To: <004c01c27a99$927b8a30$800a140a@SLNW2K> References: <20021023003959.GA23155@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <004c01c27a99$927b8a30$800a140a@SLNW2K> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 23 Oct 2002 21:13:25 -0700 Message-Id: <1035432805.9626.4.camel@rth.ninka.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 786 Lines: 18 On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 06:39, Slavcho Nikolov wrote: > As for GPL, I hope that commercial enterprises be allowed to utilize > business models > which do not necessarily consist in providing services around free software. > The more replaceable hooks you provide to filesystems and network stacks, > the better. While more hooks may be in your interest, they are not in the interest of free software. I really hope you have competant legal advice for the things you are doing, because binary-only derivative works of a GPL work are illegal. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/