Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752569Ab3JLQv0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Oct 2013 12:51:26 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com ([74.125.83.48]:42106 "EHLO mail-ee0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752147Ab3JLQvY (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Oct 2013 12:51:24 -0400 Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 18:51:20 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: David Miller Cc: cl@linux.com, tj@kernel.org, akpm@linuxfoundation.org, srostedt@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] percpu: Implement Preemption checks for __this_cpu operations V4 Message-ID: <20131012165120.GA15116@gmail.com> References: <00000141a8a7ea27-4ab5f822-e15f-4789-a5cf-f313c402a901-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20131011.140814.422793173894221852.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20131011.140814.422793173894221852.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2214 Lines: 51 * David Miller wrote: > Most sites are rejecting your posting because the CC: list looked like > this: > > Cc: akpm@linuxfoundation.org > Cc: Steven Rostedt > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Ingo Molnar > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > > Please only specify one CC: list with a comma separated list of > recipients. Another problem is that the patch emails are not properly threaded to the 0/6 patch and thus appear out of order and mixed up: 66216 N C Oct 11 Christoph Lamet ( 36) [PATCH 0/6] percpu: Implement Preemption checks for __this_cpu operations V4 66217 N C Oct 11 David Miller ( 13) └─> 66218 N C Oct 11 Christoph Lamet ( 43) ┬─>[PATCH 1/6] net: ip4_datagram_connect: Use correct form of statistics update 66219 N C Oct 11 Eric Dumazet ( 17) │ └─> 66220 N C Oct 11 Christoph Lamet ( 121) ├─>[PATCH 2/6] percpu: Add raw_cpu_ops 66221 N C Oct 11 Christoph Lamet ( 189) ├─>[PATCH 6/6] percpu: Add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops 66222 N C Oct 11 Christoph Lamet ( 64) ├─>[PATCH 5/6] net: __this_cpu_inc in route.c 66223 N C Oct 11 Christoph Lamet ( 103) ├─>[PATCH 3/6] mm: Use raw_cpu ops for determining current NUMA node 66224 N C Oct 11 Christoph Lamet ( 43) └─>[PATCH 4/6] Use raw_cpu_write for initialization of per cpu refcount. Note how the order is 1,2,6,5,3,4 with no threading instead of 1,2,3,4,5,6 with proper threading. That won't cause email servers to reject the mails, it just makes the patches a bit harder to review. Most kernel developers tend to use 'git send-email' to send patches to lkml, and that method is working pretty reliably. The relevant 'git send-email' line is pretty well described in Greg's "The newbie's guide to hacking the Linux kernel" book: http://www.tuxradar.com/content/newbies-guide-hacking-linux-kernel Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/