Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 01:44:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 01:44:19 -0400 Received: from netcore.fi ([193.94.160.1]:30217 "EHLO netcore.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 01:44:19 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:50:25 +0300 (EEST) From: Pekka Savola To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, , Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Sysctl for ICMPv6 Rate Limitation In-Reply-To: <20021024.135055.10632889.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1128 Lines: 32 On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] 吉藤英明 wrote: > This patch add sysctl for icmp6 rate limit. > This patch is against 2.4.20-pre11 (see below). ... > +icmp/*: > +ratelimit - INTEGER > + Limit the maximal rates for sending ICMPv6 packets. > + 0 to disable any limiting, otherwise the maximal rate in jiffies(1) > + Default: 100 > + Does this rate-limit all ICMPv6 packets or just ICMPv6 error messages (as specified in ICMPv6 specifications). If all, I believe the default of rate-limiting everything is unacceptable. Note that in the patch does not seem to add the rate-limit sysctl to any functions -- was that to happen in some other patch? -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/