Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 02:50:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 02:50:27 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.131]:60608 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 02:50:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:40:16 +0530 From: "Vamsi Krishna S ." To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kernel hooks interface available to non-GPL modules? Message-ID: <20021024124016.A30624@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: vamsi@in.ibm.com References: <20021023144227.O27461@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20021023144227.O27461@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>; from willy@debian.org on Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:42:27PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 825 Lines: 22 On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:42:27PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > I'm not sure this is a great idea. OK, your DECLARE_HOOK macros are _GPL > (and why are they _NOVERS_GPL? Surely this is the exact kind of thing > you want versioned?), but I wouldn't have to use the DECLARE_HOOK macros, > would I? I agree and have exported hook interfaces with _GPL in the latest version of the patch. It will be at http://www-124.ibm.com/linux/patches/?patch_id=595. -- Vamsi Krishna S. Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore. Ph: +91 80 5044959 Internet: vamsi@in.ibm.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/