Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 03:54:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 03:54:30 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:60208 "EHLO frodo.biederman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 03:54:29 -0400 To: Amol Kumar Lad Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: gzip compression of vmlinux References: <1035243705.2202.3.camel@amol.in.ishoni.com> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 24 Oct 2002 01:58:51 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1035243705.2202.3.camel@amol.in.ishoni.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 892 Lines: 17 Amol Kumar Lad writes: > Hi, > Currently we use gzip to compress vmlinux ( and finally form bzImage). > I am planning to replace it with bzip2 . Should I go ahead with it ? > Will it find its place in the latest kernel ? > We save some 35k of compressed bzImage using bzip2 You might also want to take a look at upx. It's compressor is roughly of the same quality as gzip, but it's decompresser is only a couple of hundred bytes. I don't know which will buy you more in practice. I smaller decompresser, or a larger decompresser with that compresses a little smaller. Or possibly you just want to pass -9 to gzip? Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/