Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756133Ab3JNLdX (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2013 07:33:23 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:54161 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754785Ab3JNLdW (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2013 07:33:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:33:01 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Juri Lelli Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, oleg@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, johan.eker@ericsson.com, p.faure@akatech.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, claudio@evidence.eu.com, michael@amarulasolutions.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it, nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it, luca.abeni@unitn.it, dhaval.giani@gmail.com, hgu1972@gmail.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@linux.it, insop.song@gmail.com, liming.wang@windriver.com, jkacur@redhat.com, harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, bruce.ashfield@windriver.com--no-chain-reply-to Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE structures & implementation. Message-ID: <20131014113301.GD3081@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1381747426-31334-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com> <1381747426-31334-4-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1381747426-31334-4-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1028 Lines: 31 On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:43:35PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote: > +static void replenish_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se) > +{ > + struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se); > + struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq); > + > + /* > + * We keep moving the deadline away until we get some > + * available runtime for the entity. This ensures correct > + * handling of situations where the runtime overrun is > + * arbitrary large. > + */ > + while (dl_se->runtime <= 0) { > + dl_se->deadline += dl_se->dl_deadline; > + dl_se->runtime += dl_se->dl_runtime; > + } Are we sure GCC won't be 'smart' and bite us; that is do we need something like: asm("" : "+rm" (dl_se->runtime)); in there? See: 0d98bb2656e9 sched: Prevent compiler from optimising the sched_avg_update() loop -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/