Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S265375AbSJXJ4p>; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 05:56:45 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S265376AbSJXJ4p>; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 05:56:45 -0400
Received: from rth.ninka.net ([216.101.162.244]:52123 "EHLO rth.ninka.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S265375AbSJXJ4o>;
	Thu, 24 Oct 2002 05:56:44 -0400
Subject: Re: feature request - why not make netif_rx() a pointer?
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@rth.ninka.net>
To: hps@intermeta.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <ap8eg1$8ee$1@forge.intermeta.de>
References: <20021023003959.GA23155@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
	<1035432805.9626.4.camel@rth.ninka.net>  <ap8eg1$8ee$1@forge.intermeta.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) 
Date: 24 Oct 2002 03:15:04 -0700
Message-Id: <1035454504.10558.3.camel@rth.ninka.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 569
Lines: 14

On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 02:28, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
> Distributing work based on GPL code binary-only without supplying
> the source and the modifications is (might be? is considered?)
> illegal. This is a major difference. 

That's what I meant.

Obviouslly this guy is intending to distribute his work though :)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/