Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756772Ab3JNN7f (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:59:35 -0400 Received: from mail-qe0-f41.google.com ([209.85.128.41]:52667 "EHLO mail-qe0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750811Ab3JNN7e (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:59:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:59:29 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Hong zhi guo Cc: Jens Axboe , vgoyal@redhat.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hong Zhiguo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk-throttle: simplify logic by token bucket algorithm Message-ID: <20131014135929.GH4722@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1381574794-7639-1-git-send-email-zhiguohong@tencent.com> <1381741757-20888-1-git-send-email-zhiguohong@tencent.com> <20131014133620.GF4722@htj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 553 Lines: 16 On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 09:53:54PM +0800, Hong zhi guo wrote: > I've not tested hierarchical setup yet. I'll do it tomorrow. > BTW, what kind of setup do you expect? Is hierarchy of 2 levels enough? That should cover most of the functionalities but going for 3 levels can't hurt, right? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/