Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:32:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:32:36 -0400 Received: from pixpat.austin.ibm.com ([192.35.232.241]:43990 "EHLO baldur.austin.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:32:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:38:06 -0500 From: Dave McCracken To: "Martin J. Bligh" , Bill Davidsen cc: Rik van Riel , "Eric W. Biederman" , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel , Linux Memory Management Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.43-mm2] New shared page table patch Message-ID: <9100000.1035470286@baldur.austin.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <2832683854.1035444175@[10.10.2.3]> References: <2832683854.1035444175@[10.10.2.3]> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.0a4 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1008 Lines: 26 --On Thursday, October 24, 2002 07:22:56 -0700 "Martin J. Bligh" wrote: >> Another thought, how does this play with NUMA systems? I don't have the >> problem, but presumably there are implications. > > At some point we'll probably only want one shared set per node. > Gets tricky when you migrate processes across nodes though - will > need more thought Page tables can only be shared when they're pointing to the same data pages anyway, so I think it's just part of the larger problem of node-local memory. Dave McCracken ====================================================================== Dave McCracken IBM Linux Base Kernel Team 1-512-838-3059 dmccr@us.ibm.com T/L 678-3059 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/