Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759201Ab3JOMgJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2013 08:36:09 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:55047 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759177Ab3JOMgH (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2013 08:36:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:35:27 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Juri Lelli , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, oleg@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, johan.eker@ericsson.com, p.faure@akatech.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, claudio@evidence.eu.com, michael@amarulasolutions.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it, nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it, luca.abeni@unitn.it, dhaval.giani@gmail.com, hgu1972@gmail.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@linux.it, insop.song@gmail.com, liming.wang@windriver.com, jkacur@redhat.com, harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, bruce.ashfield@windriver.com--no-chain-reply-to Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] sched: make dl_bw a sub-quota of rt_bw Message-ID: <20131015123527.GI10651@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1381747426-31334-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com> <1381747426-31334-13-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com> <20131014140618.GA26604@gmail.com> <525D1234.5060001@gmail.com> <20131015102621.GE10651@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20131015122522.GB2402@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131015122522.GB2402@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 863 Lines: 19 On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:25:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Really, please make it _symmetric_ ... > > Single core systems are becoming a historic curiosity, should we should > justify every piece of extra complexity we add for them. > > So I'd rather see obvious SMP code where the UP case works fine too, and > _then_ maybe check a separate patch that adds the UP optimization, with > (object size) numbers proving that it's worth it, etc. That's a slightly larger task than it appears; the core scheduler code they rely on with smp doesn't exist on up. We can do this but we need to do it scheduler wide. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/