Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:59:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:59:36 -0400 Received: from bitchcake.off.net ([216.138.242.5]:151 "EHLO mail.off.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:59:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:05:46 -0400 From: Zach Brown To: Manfred Spraul , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: arjanv@redhat.com Subject: Re: [CFT] faster athlon/duron memory copy implementation Message-ID: <20021024140546.Q12512@bitchcake.off.net> References: <3DB82ABF.8030706@colorfullife.com> <1035481054.735.52.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1035481054.735.52.camel@phantasy>; from rml@tech9.net on Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:37:34PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2012 Lines: 45 > On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 13:15, Manfred Spraul wrote: > > > Attached is a test app that compares several memory copy implementations. > > Could you run it and report the results to me, together with cpu, > > chipset and memory type? CPU0: AMD Athlon(tm) MP 1800+ stepping 02 in a tyan tiger mpx (amd762 north bridge), two 512m non-buffered pc2100 ddr sticks, in a mostly-idle dual workstation: copy_page() tests copy_page function 'warm up run' took 16543 cycles per page copy_page function '2.4 non MMX' took 18241 cycles per page copy_page function '2.4 MMX fallback' took 18144 cycles per page copy_page function '2.4 MMX version' took 16551 cycles per page copy_page function 'faster_copy' took 10099 cycles per page copy_page function 'even_faster' took 10218 cycles per page copy_page function 'no_prefetch' took 9618 cycles per page copy_page() tests copy_page function 'warm up run' took 16618 cycles per page copy_page function '2.4 non MMX' took 18274 cycles per page copy_page function '2.4 MMX fallback' took 18126 cycles per page copy_page function '2.4 MMX version' took 16649 cycles per page copy_page function 'faster_copy' took 10100 cycles per page copy_page function 'even_faster' took 10219 cycles per page copy_page function 'no_prefetch' took 9571 cycles per page copy_page() tests copy_page function 'warm up run' took 16571 cycles per page copy_page function '2.4 non MMX' took 18265 cycles per page copy_page function '2.4 MMX fallback' took 18076 cycles per page copy_page function '2.4 MMX version' took 16558 cycles per page copy_page function 'faster_copy' took 10112 cycles per page copy_page function 'even_faster' took 10207 cycles per page copy_page function 'no_prefetch' took 9582 cycles per page - z - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/