Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:18:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:18:26 -0400 Received: from 12-231-249-244.client.attbi.com ([12.231.249.244]:6930 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:18:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:22:58 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Scott Murray Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , Steven Dake , James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Advanced TCA SCSI Disk Hotswap Message-ID: <20021024232258.GA26093@kroah.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 878 Lines: 21 On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 07:00:23PM -0400, Scott Murray wrote: > > I've not implemented it yet, but I'm pretty sure I can detect surprise > extractions in my cPCI driver. The only thing holding me back at the > moment is that there's no clear way to report this status change via > pcihpfs without doing something a bit funky like reporting "-1" in the > "adapter" node. Why would you need to report anything other than if the card is present or not? What would a "supprise" removal cause you to do differently? Hm, well I guess we should be extra careful in trying to shut down any driver bound to that card... thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/