Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:21:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:21:50 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.132]:46502 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:21:49 -0400 Message-ID: <3DB880E8.747C7EEC@us.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:23:20 -0700 From: mingming cao Reply-To: cmm@us.ibm.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-pre5 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Hugh Dickins , manfred@colorfullife.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch References: <3DB86B05.447E7410@us.ibm.com> <3DB87458.F5C7DABA@digeo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 825 Lines: 25 Andrew Morton wrote: > > mingming cao wrote: > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > Here is the updated ipc lock patch: > > Well I can get you a bit of testing and attention, but I'm afraid > my knowledge of the IPC code is negligible. > > So to be able to commend this change to Linus I'd have to rely on > assurances from people who _do_ understand IPC (Hugh?) and on lots > of testing. Thanks for your quick feedback. I did LTP tests on it--it passed(well, I saw a failure on shmctl(), but the failure was there since 2.5.43 kernel). I will do more stress tests on it soon. Mingming - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/