Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:41:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:41:52 -0400 Received: from ns.cinet.co.jp ([210.166.75.130]:59921 "EHLO multi.cinet.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:41:51 -0400 Message-ID: From: Osamu Tomita To: "'Takashi Iwai '" Cc: "'LKML '" Subject: RE: [PATCHSET 22/25] add support for PC-9800 architecture (sound alsa) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:47:55 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1027 Lines: 30 Hi. -----Original Message----- From: Takashi Iwai To: Osamu Tomita Cc: LKML Sent: 2002/10/24 0:46 Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 22/25] add support for PC-9800 architecture (sound alsa) > the question is, whether cs4232 module works on PC9800, or not. > i guess the control-port is not used on this card. in such a case, > you can deactivate the control-port via module option (or even add > ifdef for the specific kernel config). Test results on some PC-9800 (including not CS4232 chip), snd-cs4232 driver works fine with snd_isapnp=0 snd_cport=-1 options. Thanks for your advice. Another problem, I'm tring to separate mpu401 driver for PC-9800. To do this, I need to patch many files. So I think previus patch is better than separated driver. How do you think? Regards Osamu Tomita - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/