Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 05:13:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 05:13:06 -0400 Received: from elixir.e.kth.se ([130.237.48.5]:30991 "EHLO elixir.e.kth.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 05:13:05 -0400 To: Dave Jones Cc: Ed Sweetman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [CFT] faster athlon/duron memory copy implementation References: <3DB82ABF.8030706@colorfullife.com> <200210242048.36859.earny@net4u.de> <3DB85385.6030302@wmich.edu> <20021024202654.GA14351@suse.de> From: mru@users.sourceforge.net (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Date: 25 Oct 2002 11:19:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: Dave Jones's message of "Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:26:54 +0100" Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 525 Lines: 11 Dave Jones writes: > The functions being benchmarked are written in assembly. > gcc will not change these in any way, making compiler flags > or revision irrelevant. Doesn't gcc schedule inline assembly instructions? -- M?ns Rullg?rd mru@users.sf.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/