Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 20:47:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 20:47:43 -0500 Received: from snowbird.megapath.net ([216.200.176.7]:64774 "EHLO megapathdsl.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 20:47:34 -0500 Message-ID: <3A7B63D1.2588963B@megapathdsl.net> Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 17:50:09 -0800 From: Miles Lane X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.1-ac1 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Mason CC: newsreader@mediaone.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: did 2.4 messed up lilo? In-Reply-To: <786060000.981147343@tiny> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Chris Mason wrote: > > On Friday, February 02, 2001 03:36:18 PM -0500 newsreader@mediaone.net > wrote: > > > I'm not sure whether this problem is related > > to 2.4 kernel. > > > > I suspect it is a reiserfs problem, and that you are using lilo older than > 21.6. Are you mounting /boot with -o notail? > > Regardless, I'm willing to bet upgrading to lilo 21.6 will solve this. It > calls an ioctl reiserfs provides to unpack small files, and I've seen it > fix this exact problem on one of my devel boxes (no lilo prompt, append > lines in lilo.conf ignored). I also found this patch for lilo 21.6: http://industrial-linux.org/distro/download/lilo-21.6-glibc-2.2-reiserfs.patch Perhaps someone familiar with the lilo and reiserfs code could explain whether or not this patch is really needed. Miles - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/