Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:25:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:25:08 -0400 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.103]:18058 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:25:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch From: Paul Larson To: cmm@us.ibm.com Cc: Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , manfred@colorfullife.com, lkml , dipankar@in.ibm.com, lse-tech In-Reply-To: <3DB880E8.747C7EEC@us.ibm.com> References: <3DB86B05.447E7410@us.ibm.com> <3DB87458.F5C7DABA@digeo.com> <3DB880E8.747C7EEC@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 25 Oct 2002 09:21:51 -0500 Message-Id: <1035555715.3447.150.camel@plars> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 856 Lines: 18 On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 18:23, mingming cao wrote: > Thanks for your quick feedback. I did LTP tests on it--it passed(well, > I saw a failure on shmctl(), but the failure was there since 2.5.43 > kernel). I will do more stress tests on it soon. Which shmctl() test is this? To my knowledge, there are no current known issues with shmctl tests. There is however one with sem02 in semctl() that last I heard has been partially fixed in the kernel and still needs to be fixed in glibc. Is that the one you are referring to, or is there really some other shmctl test in LTP that is failing? Thanks, Paul Larson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/